|
Engaged theory is a methodological framework for understanding social complexity. It takes social life or social relations as its base category, with 'the social' always understood as grounded in 'the natural', including humans as embodied beings. Engaged theory provides a framework that moves from detailed empirical analysis about things, people and processes in the world〔See for example the engaged research associated with Circles of Sustainability. (www.CirclesofSustainability.org )〕 to abstract theory about the constitution and social framing of those things, people and processes.〔See Paul James, ''Globalism, Nationalism, Tribalism: Bringing Theory Back In'', Sage Publications, London, 2006 ()〕 Engaged theory is one approach within the broader tradition of critical theory. Engaged theory crosses the fields of sociology, anthropology, political studies, history, philosophy, and global studies. At its most general, the term ''engaged theory'' is used to describe theories that provide a tool box for engaging with the world while seeking to change it.〔James Clifford, ‘On Ethnographic Authority’, Representations, vol. 1, no. 2, 1983, pp. 118–146.〕 One lineage of engaged theory is called the ‘constitutive abstraction’ approach associated with a group of writers publishing in ''Arena Journal'' such as John Hinkson, Geoff Sharp (1926-2015), and Simon Cooper.〔For a book that uses this approach see Simon Cooper, ''Techno-Culture and Critical Theory'', Routledge, London, 2002. One of the most important early pieces of writing in this approach was Geoff Sharp, ‘Constitutive Abstraction and Social Practice’, ''Arena'', 70, 1985, pp. 48–82.〕 A related lineage of engaged theory has been developed by researchers who began their association through the Globalism Research Centre in Australia – scholars such as Manfred Steger, Paul James and Damian Grenfell – drawing upon a range of writers from Pierre Bourdieu to Benedict Anderson and Charles Taylor. A group of researchers at Western Sydney University describe their work as 'Engaged Research'.〔http://www.uws.edu.au/ics/about〕 ==The politics of engagement== For all of its concern for epistemological grounding (see below), Engaged theory is an approach that is 'in the world'. All theory in some way affects what happens in the world, but it does not always theorize its own place in the constitution of ideas and practices. Anthony Giddens calls this movement a double hermeneutic.〔Anthony Giddens (1987), ''Social Theory and Modern Sociology'', Cambridge, Polity Press.〕 Engaged theory is more explicit than most about its political standpoint. Carol J. Adams expresses one dimension of this when she writes: However, the other important dimension is that any theory needs to be aware of its own tendencies to be ideologically driven by dominant concerns of its day. Liberalism, for example, with its reductive advocacy of the ideology of 'freedom', fails to be reflexive about this dimension. Similarly, critical theory sometimes fails to be reflexive of what it means to be critical or advocate social change. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Engaged theory」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|